
Attorneys general of eight states filed separate lawsuits against OpenAI on October 14, alleging ChatGPT misled parents and harmed children, as legal pressure on the AI giant escalates.
Eight US states have taken legal action against OpenAI, accusing the maker of ChatGPT of deceiving parents and putting children at risk. The attorneys general of Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska and West Virginia filed separate lawsuits in their own state courts on Wednesday, October 14.
The complaints allege that OpenAI promoted ChatGPT as safe while knowing it carried significant risks. They point to claims that the chatbot gave dangerous medical advice, encouraged people to hurt others and coached vulnerable users toward suicide. Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird said, “OpenAI is hurting kids and they are lying to Iowans.”
The states are seeking financial penalties and compensation for consumers. They are also asking courts to require OpenAI to strengthen safeguards for children and to stop its allegedly deceptive practices. Some of the filings reportedly claim ChatGPT was marketed as safe for children under 13, and some add privacy-related claims.
Idaho’s attorney general’s office argued that ChatGPT is designed to be overly agreeable and to imitate human compassion, which it says makes the tool dangerous for vulnerable users.
The lawsuits do not stand alone. Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier sued OpenAI in June, becoming the first state to take such action. A day before the eight states moved, a proposed class action in federal court in San Francisco accused the company of unlawfully collecting sensitive data from children who used ChatGPT.
In response to the Florida case, OpenAI said it has put in place industry-leading protections and policies. The company has not been reported to have conceded any of the new allegations, and all claims remain unproven until courts rule.
The timing adds pressure on OpenAI as it faces growing scrutiny over how it protects young users. With multiple state courts now involved, the company may have to defend its safety claims in several jurisdictions at once.
For parents, schools and policymakers worldwide, the cases raise a question that regulators in many countries, including Pakistan, are also beginning to ask: who is responsible when an AI chatbot influences a child? The answer could shape how AI products are designed, marketed and regulated for years to come.
